All posts by Mike

Graco Size4Me 65 Review: The Best Budget Convertible

The Graco Size4Me 65 is perhaps my favorite budget convertible car seat of all time, simply due to the amazing value it offers families interested in an affordable entry to extended rear-facing. This is a review of the Size4Me 65, which you can buy at Amazon, and why it should either be the first car seat you ever buy for your children or the first seat you buy after they outgrow their infant seat. It’s easily one of the best car seats currently available in the United States; let’s take a closer look at how and why that’s the case.

Graco Size4Me 65 – What’s the big deal?

The Graco Size4Me 65 sounds a bit like a Fisher Price toy, but functionality is what’s important, and in terms of functionality, this is one of the most impressive budget-minded seats on the market from one of the most established names in the field. It’s a convertible car seat, which means it can be used in several configurations, including as a rear-facing infant seat, a forward-facing seat, and of course, as a booster. It has a number of aliases (the Fit4Me, the My Size 65, and the Headwise 65 and Headwise 70), each of which are almost identical, and is designed to enable parents to rear-face their children longer on a smaller budget. Is it worth it? Read on to find out!

Buy the Graco Size4Me 65 on Sale with Free Shipping at Amazon.

Graco Size4Me 65 Limits for Weight and Height

Rear-facing: 5-40 pounds. Your child’s head should not reach past 1″ below the top of the headrest. There is no given height limit for the child besides the 1″ rule. The shell height is around 27.5″ tall, which means there’s a lot of room for growth before children will outgrow it by height.

Forward-facing: 20-65 pounds, and under 52″ in height. The tips of your child’s ears need to be below the top end of the head rest. Your child should be at least 1, and it’s recommended that s/he is at least 2. Of course, research into car safety indicates children should remain rear-facing for as long as possible (the average is 4 years in Sweden, which posts the lowest child fatality rate on Earth), and after rear-facing, the child should remain forward-facing as long as possible.

Keep in mind that the Graco Size4Me 70 and Headwise70 are essentially the same seat but give you 5 extra pounds of forward-facing goodness.

Dimensions of the Graco Size4Me 65

The seat is 18.5″ wide at its widest point and 23.5″ high. It is around 22″ long. The bottom harness height is 8″ and slightly less when the infant insert is present, while the top harness height is at 17.5″. It has a 7-year product life.

Using the Graco Size4Me 65

Something I like about the Graco Size4Me 65 is that it’s incredibly easy to adjust harness height. There are a number of seats that make this process ridiculous, usually by having you rethread harness straps like a tailor or uninstall the seat over and over again. The Size4Me does away with that nonsense with a Simply Safe Adjust system of harness adjustment that lets you simply squeeze a lever to move the harness up and down. This alone is worth the price of admission (which, as you’ll see below, is among the most reasonable on the ERF market). You can even adjust it from the front of the seat! It ranges from 7″ to close to 17″ in terms of the torso height when a child is sitting in the seat.

Something I’ve become more impressed about over the years are car seats that do well with smaller infants, as the best car seat is useless if your children can’t sit safely in it. The Size4Me is rated down to 4 pounds. I can verify that it works well with 7 pound newborns, but it might be a bit tricky with preemies; it’ll depend on the child. Keep in mind that a number of convertible car seats don’t work well with newborns, so this is something to be lauded in the Size4Me.

There’s also a lever in the front designed to make it easy for you to set the recline of the seat. This doesn’t sound like a big deal, but it’s a nice comfort. There’s one rear-facing setting and two forward-facing settings. If you need to make the adjustment, double check your installation afterward. I also like the inclusion of a ball level indicator to help you make sure you’re reclining the seat properly when rear-facing.

In general, the installation of the seat is pretty straightforward, and I didn’t have any trouble achieving a good fit. Keep in mind that it’s not the smallest convertible out there, but that’s part of the price you pay for having one that has such great height limits. It’s still shorter than a Diono, and not much wider than one, either.

Buy the Graco Size4Me 65 on Sale with Free Shipping at Amazon.

Why Buy the Graco Size4Me 65?

This is the meat and potatoes of this car seat. The Graco Size4Me 65 is one of several seats in the United States that allow you to rear-face a child for up to 40 pounds. This isn’t as good as it gets anymore, but it’s still decent. Every pound is precious, as the longer you rear-face, the safer your child is. In the US, parents tend to turn their children around into the line of fire at 1. In Sweden, this typically isn’t done until 4. Children in Sweden are far less likely to die in car crashes than children in the US. It makes that much of a difference. This alone is reason enough to buy the Size4Me 65.

Besides that, the real show stopper for the Size4Me 65 is that it has an amazing, amazing height limit. I measure it as even higher than those in the Foonf and Diono seats! Most children outgrow their seats by height instead of by weight, which sends parents scrambling to find alternative solutions as they nervously watch their children’s heads approaching the tops of their head rests. However, with the Size4Me, you’re almost guaranteed to run out of weight first, which means that you’re almost guaranteed to get 4 years of rear-facing goodness from this seat.

That is beautiful–especially considering the price of this seat. It’s a very democratic car seat by this measure.

The picture isn’t quite as optimistic when forward-facing, as there your children will almost certainly outgrow it by height before weight, but with 52″ of room, it’s likely you’ll get up to 60 pounds of use out of it, which is good. Only a few seats like the Dionos will do better here.

Years later, it’s still one of the most affordable ERF seats on the market

Let’s be honest: the Graco Size4Me 65 is not going to win any awards for uber-long RF weight among its fellow convertibles. However, it’s designed to fill a niche, and in that respect, it does so well. It’s a great seat for parents interested in rear-facing who don’t have the budget for the highest weight seats. It’s also a great seat for parents of tall, skinny kids, and it also works well if you don’t have a child who’s high in the weight percentiles, yet still want him or her to rear-face until kindergarten. It’s also reasonably skinny, so you will be able to fit three across, whether with this or with other car seats, in most vehicles that are mid-sized or larger.

The biggest strike against the Graco Size4Me 65 is the fact that there are seats that allow you to RF significantly longer by weight. I also wish it had more than a 7-year product life. However, if price and height flexibility are important to you, the Graco Size4Me 65 will give you both while still helping you ERF. This is a sleeper seat that shows you don’t need to break the bank in order to keep your child rear-facing for a good amount of time. In that sense, it’s the best seat I’ve reviewed.

I recommend the Graco Size4Me 65 wholeheartedly. You can buy the Graco Size4Me 65 in a range of colors here.

If you find my information on best practices in car and car seat safety helpful, you can do your shopping through this Amazon link. Canadians can shop here for Canadian purchases. Have a question or want to discuss best practices? Send me an email at carcrashdetective [at] gmail [dot] com.

Two Women Killed, Three Children Hurt near Kerman, CA, in Car vs. Pickup Crash

Who:
Maria Ledesma, 67, and her daughter, Christina Ledesma, 29, were killed on 3/21/14 at 7:30 AM at the intersections of Jensen and Goldenrod Avenues near Kerman, CA. Both women sat in the front, while three children under age 5 sat in the back. Two received mild to moderate injuries, while a third suffered severe head trauma from the car’s roof collapse in the rollover. Erick Diaz, 34, impacted them in a 2003 Dodge Dakota. Christina was a mother to one of the three children and babysitting the remaining two. Diaz received minor injuries.

How:
The Tercel was eastbound on Jenson. The Dakota ran the Goldenrod stop sign while southbound at 55 mph. It impacted the Tercel on the driver’s side and both vehicles rolled. The two women died at the scene, while the children were injured. Diaz stated he did not notice the stop sign.

When:
This appears to be another sad case of fatalities resulting from an individual running a stop sign. What makes this case particularly tragic is that the law-abiding citizens were killed due to the negligence of the law-breaking driver.

The 1995 Tercel weighs ~2000 lbs and did not come with a side impact score or side airbags. It would have received a “poor” side rating due to the lack of airbags and high degree of cabin intrusion. It was impacted by a 2003 Dakota, which weighed ~3589 lbs. That’s 109% of the weight of the simulated vehicle in the IIHS side impact test.

Given the likely speeds of the collision (~55 mph), the collision likely imparted at least 492KJ of energy into the Tercel. The standard side impact test simulates 143KJ of energy (a 3300-lb sled impacting a vehicle at 31 mph). In other words, the Tercel’s occupants faced 344% of the force they’d have experienced in the types of crashes cars are side rated for. Given the speed of the collision and the lack of airbags and structural integrity of the Tercel, their odds of survival were, sadly, virtually non-existent.

It is highly noteworthy that all three children survived the collision, albeit with various degrees of injury. It is almost certain that all three children were belted, and a car seat was recovered from the scene of the collision, suggesting at least one child was very securely restrained. Given their survival, it is likely that all three children were restrained in well-fitting car seats that met all relevant safety requirements. What we have here is another sad example of the orphan seat phenomenon, wherein the children survived due to their proper restraints while the adults in the vehicle did not.

This collision was completely preventable. Diaz will likely face vehicular manslaughter charges.

If you find the information on car safety, recommended car seats, and car seat reviews on this car seat blog helpful, you can shop through this Amazon link for any purchases, car seat-related or not. Canadians can shop through this link for Canadian purchases.

Chicco KeyFit 30 Review: Why Buy the Chicco KeyFit 30?

The Chicco KeyFit 30 is one of the most popular infant car seats available today in the United States, which is part of why I was eager to take a closer look at it. How easy is it to install? What kinds of features does it offer over a number of similar seats in its price range (e.g., the Britax B-Safe 35)? And of course, how good of a job does it do keeping kids safe? These are some of the questions I tried to answer in this review of the KeyFit 30.

2018 update: The KeyFit 30 continues to be one of my favorite infant seats on the market, because it’s reliable, affordable, easy to install, and narrow enough to fit 3 across in pretty much any vehicle. The weight and height limits remain the same, although fabric options have been updated slightly. Remember that the cheapest seats aren’t necessarily the best ones–the ones that make it easy to live the rest of your life while knowing your kids are safe–those are worth spending a bit more on. The KeyFit is one of those seats.

Chicco KeyFit 30 – What’s the big deal?

KeyFit 30 review on The Car Crash Detective.
The KeyFit 30 takes care of your baby and stays out of your way. That’s as good as an infant seat gets.
KeyFit 30 review on The Car Crash Detective.
The KeyFit is available in a range of colors (and some of them are rather cute).

The Chicco KeyFit 30 isn’t the kind of seat I’d typically review, given my preference for convertibles and combination seats, but functionality is what’s important, and in terms of functionality, this is one of the most impressive seats on the market.

It’s an infant car seat, which means it can be used in one configuration: as a rear-facing infant seat. It does not forward face; for that, you’ll need a convertible.

It’s one of the newest infant seats from Chicco, and aims to improve child safety by increasing the odds parents have of correctly installing and using car seats from day one. Is it worth it? Read on to find out!

Chicco KeyFit 30 Limits for Weight and Height

Rear-facing: 4-30 pounds. Your child’s head should not reach past 1″ below the top of the main shell. There is also a 30″ height limit for the child.

Of course, as a good parent, you’re not going to stop at 30 lbs, since research into car safety indicates children should remain rear-facing for as long as possible (the average is 4 years in Sweden, which posts the lowest child fatality rate on Earth), and after rear-facing, the child should remain forward-facing as long as possible.

Buy the Chicco KeyFit 30 on Sale with Free Shipping at Amazon here.

Dimensions of the Chicco KeyFit 30

The seat is 17″ wide at its widest point and 22″ high. The seat weighs 9.6 pounds, which makes it the lightest seat I’ve reviewed so far. Of course, being an infant seat, it should be much lighter than a convertible.

Using the Chicco KeyFit 30

Chicco calls the Keyfit 30 the easiest infant car seat a parent can install, and goes as far as to call it the highest rated infant car seat throughout the United States. These are big claims to back up, but I’d say they’re pretty close to accurate. I was surprised myself until I took a look at the seat. What makes the Keyfit so awesome? It’s a seat that was clearly thought out well ahead of time, and that led to a good design and solid construction. Here’s what it’s like to use it.

The Keyfit 30 covers are machine washable (use the cold water cycle on delicate with a mild detergent, and line dry them). The seat can be detached from its base and attached to Chicco strollers, which makes it easy to transport your children while on the go. The harness adjuster is very, very smooth, which helps in tightening and loosening straps. The manual is available in English and Spanish and makes sense in both languages. You can achieve a good install with either the seat belt or with lower LATCH anchors. Don’t use both, of course. The seat may be installed with or without the base. I like the base because it makes it a snap (literally) to install and remove the seat, which is crucial for getting a newborn or young infant out of a vehicle or into one without waking him or her.

Something else I like about the Keyfit 30 is that it is preemie friendly. There are a lot of seats that require a lot of hoops such as blanket rolling to make work with premature infants, and any mother who has purchased, bought, and returned several car seats to and from the NICU in effort to find a seat that makes a good fit knows how thankless of a task that is. However, the Keyfit 30 fits preemies easily (as long as they weigh at least 4 pounds), which is a blessing.

Buy the Chicco KeyFit 30 on Sale with Free Shipping at Amazon here.

Why Buy the Chicco KeyFit 30?

The Chico KeyFit 30 is not designed to help you rear-face a child until the cows come home. What it does well is provide parents with a convenient and nearly fool-proof method of getting their child safely from the hospital and around for the first few months of life. After that, I’d recommend replacing it with a convertible seat with the highest RF limits you can find. In other words, look for these seats. Remember, every pound is precious, as the longer you rear-face, the safer your child is. In the US, parents tend to turn their children around into the line of fire at 1. In Sweden, this typically isn’t done until 4. Children in Sweden are far less likely to die in car crashes than children in the US. It makes that much of a difference.

If ERF is what’s most important, then you might wonder why I’d suggest a seat that doesn’t come anywhere close to the best ERF limits. That’s because infant seats aren’t designed to RF forever. They’re for convenience! A class A convertible like a Foonf weighs more than 30 pounds; add the 7 pounds of a newborn and there’s no way you’re going to take that seat and child anywhere if it’s all you have as a child seat.

In contrast, with a seat like the Keyfit 30, you buy it packaged with a stroller, such as with the Keyfit 30 Travel System, and use the seat and stroller to transport your child when walking, and move the seat with your newborn about without waking up your child. Later, as your child gains in weight, you’ll naturally stop using the infant seat and start using the stroller or a good baby carrier to transport him or her, and when s/he’s in the car, you’ll use a high quality convertible car seat, and then later a combination seat. That’s the easiest way to navigate the practicalities of weight, children, car seats, and transportation. Start with the infant seat and stroller, or infant seat and carrier, and transition to the stroller or carrier and convertible seat.

I recommend the Chicco Keyfit 30 wholeheartedly. You can buy the KeyFit 30 in a range of colors hereCanadians can buy the KeyFit 30 by itself or with a range of travel systems here.

If you find my information on best practices in car and car seat safety helpful, you can do your shopping through this Amazon link. Canadians can  shop here for Canadian purchases. Have a question or want to discuss best practices? Join us in the forums!

2014 Clek Fllo Preview…Review on the Way: Release August 2014!

Update: my full review of the Clek Fllo is available here!

If you follow this blog, you know I’m always interested in advances in car safety, which for me, includes advances in opportunities to practice Extended Rear Facing, or ERF, in car seats. We’ve already got a few seats capable of RF until 50 pounds, including the Foonf by Canadian manufacturer Clek. Well, this August, Clek is adding a compact convertible to their lineup, and it’s called the Fllo. I’m contacting some of my sources to learn more about the seat and hope to have more information soon. For now, here’s what we know:

The Fllo is Clek’s first attempt at a convertible that’s more affordable, yet without compromises in the safety and style that’s come to be associated with Clek. It should be priced between $350 and $430, with the DRIFT fabric print (pictured) at the lower end and the Tokidoki prints rounding out the high mark. If you’d like Crypton technology, which makes things easier to clean, be prepared to fork out $380, while premium Crypton will run at $400. Overall, these prices are lower than the Foonf’s, though not by very much.

What are the advantages of the Fllo compared to the Foonf? Well, for one, it’s going to be a bit cheaper. Second, since the Fllo will sit lower than the Foonf, it’ll save some room and will give you the ability to see behind you a bit better when driving, which is enough to make a number of parents consider it over the Foonf.

Personally, I think the Fllo is going to be a great seat, and I can’t wait to get my hands on one (it won’t be long!). The price point is lower and the aesthetic is a bit different, but the goal is still to provide unparalleled safety blended wonderfully with style. I’ll have a review as soon as I have one in my hands.

Here are the crucial stats:



Rear-Facing

Weight Limits: 14-50 lbs (same as Foonf).
Height Limits: 25-43 in (same as Foonf).
Seat Weight: 25 lbs (lower than the 38 lbs of the Foonf!)
Seat Width: 16.9 in (smaller than 17 in of the Foonf)
Front/Back: 29 in without anti-rebound bar, 32.5 in with (smaller than 33 in of Foonf)
Seat Height: 23.5 in (shorter than 25.75 in of Foonf)

Forward-Facing
Weight Limits: 22-65 lbs (same as Foonf).
Height Limits: 30-49 in (same as Foonf).
Seat Weight: 24 lbs (lower than the 33 lbs of the Foonf!)
Seat Width: 16.9 in (smaller than 17 in of the Foonf)
Seat Height: 26-30.5 in (shorter than 28.25-32.5 in of Foonf)

How Do I Pre-Order?

I’ll update links to the review here as soon as I get the chance to. The seat will start shipping as of August 29th, 2014! You can pre-order it now via the following links:

2014 Clek Fllo in “Drift.”

2014 Clek Fllo in “Ink.”

2014 Clek Fllo in “Flamingo.”

2014 Clek Fllo in “TokiDoki.”

Update: my full review of the Clek Fllo is available here!

If you find the information on car safety, recommended car seats, and car seat reviews on this car seat blog helpful, you can bookmark and shop through this Amazon link. Canadians can bookmark and shop through this link.

Four Killed, Child Injured in Car vs. SUV Crash

Who:
Judge Terri Johnson, 40, drove a 2009-era Volkswagen Passat the wrong way on Highway 287 close to Decatur, TX, around 6 PM Saturday evening, 4/26/14, and killed herself and Juan Jose Rios, 32; Sherry Ann Rios, 50; and Amy Dee Culwell, 35; who were driving in a 2009-era Chevrolet Trailblazer. A 4 year old girl in the Trailblazer was severely injured in the collision, but is expected to survive. Unfortunately, her parents did not.

How:
Slightly before 6PM, Johnson, who was traveling the wrong way (southbound) in the northbound SH 287 lane, drove head on into a northbound Trailblazer. The three adults in the Trailblazer and Johnson in the Passat were killed on impact, while the 4 year old, who was not restrained in a child seat, was ejected from the vehicle. Per the police, no evidence of alcohol has as yet been found. However, witnesses who’d called 911 reported seeing her driving erratically from one side of the road to the next in the minutes preceding the crash. A number of witnesses arrived at the scene immediately after the crash and attempted to offer aid to both vehicle’s occupants, including a number of truckers who put out the Trailblazer fire with extinguishers.

Why:
It is currently unknown why Johnson was driving the wrong way down a highway in broad daylight, although given the near 100% frequency with which alcohol or drugs are a factor in wrong way fatal collisions, I have to wonder if she was driving under the influence of said substances. What is absolutely certain is that the collision was the result of her actions, and that four individuals are dead and a child critically injured as a result.

Investigating the physics of the crash, the sheer number of fatalities is surprising and saddening. The 2009 Passat weighs 3435 lbs and comes with a “good” IIHS frontal score. It was impacted by a 2009 Trailblazer that weighs 4641 lbs, or 135% of the Passat’s weight and was rated only “acceptable” in its frontal score. As a result, the Passat driver automatically faced 35% more force in the collision than she would have if she’d collided with another Passat, placing her at a significant disadvantage in the collision. The Trailblazer occupants, meanwhile, experienced 26% lower forces due to the weight advantage. However, the “acceptable” score worked against them, significantly reducing the protection the vehicle should have afforded them.

Given the likely speeds of the collision (~65 mph, per witness reports), the collision likely imparted at least 889KJ of energy into the Passat. The Passat frontal impact test simulates 249KJ of energy (a Passat impacting another at 40 mph). In other words, the Passat driver faced 357% of the force she’d have experienced in the type of crash her car was rated for. Given the speed of the collision, her odds of survival were next to zero.

The Trailblazer frontal test simulated 337KJ of energy (a Trailblazer impacting another at 40 mph), indicating that its occupants would have faced 195% of the forces the vehicle was rated to safely withstand, given that the Passat imparted 658KJ of energy into the Trailblazer.

This should have been a survivable collision for the Trailblazer’s occupants, but none of the adults did. Witness reports indicated that the vehicle may have been thrown several feet into the air by the force of the impact, which could have led to the deaths of the adults. Somehow, however, the child survived, despite not being restrained in a rear-facing seat and being partially ejected from the vehicle. A 4-year-old child should ideally be in a rear-facing seat, and if not, should definitely be in a forward-facing harnessed seat.

This was a completely preventable tragedy, and a potentially corruptly investigated one. The results of Johnson’s toxicology test stated she was not under the influence of any substances.

I don’t believe those results.

If you find the information on car safety, recommended car seats, and car seat reviews on this car seat blog helpful, you can shop through this Amazon link for any purchases, car seat-related or not. Canadians can shop through this link for Canadian purchases.